From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu May 15 17:51:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27710 for alpha-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 17:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA27705 for ; Thu, 15 May 1997 17:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA16212; Thu, 15 May 1997 17:43:50 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199705160043.RAA16212@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Alpha questions.. To: cgd@pa.dec.com (Chris G. Demetriou) Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 17:43:50 -0700 (MST) Cc: gallatin@CS.Duke.EDU, imp@village.org, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <717.863741892@dnaunix.pa.dec.com> from "Chris G. Demetriou" at May 15, 97 05:18:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Download milo & have a look. The palcode claims to be the OSF > > PAL code. > > It is, but it is _not_ identical to the OSF PALcode in the SRM console > firmware in several ways. > > At minimum: > > (1) there are some interfaces provided by the SRM console's > OSF PALcode on some platforms which are not provided > by the MILO OSF PALcode, and > > (2) machine-checking handling/logout frames are different. (3) The SRM code for OSF/1 requires 32M. The Linux code only requires 16M(*) (*) according to the guy here at the University of Arizona who did the Linux stuff. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.