From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 10:14:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC36C1065674 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [194.255.56.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804A88FC0C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ACD226D400; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0100 From: Anton Berezin To: milki Message-ID: <20110210101414.GB75152@heechee.tobez.org> References: <20110210091512.GE81862@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20110210093934.GA75152@heechee.tobez.org> <20110210094416.GG81862@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110210094416.GG81862@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> X-Powered-By: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITES/MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR for perl ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:14:15 -0000 On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:44:17AM -0800, milki wrote: > On 10:39 Thu 10 Feb , Anton Berezin wrote: > > It is better to use modules/by-module because the author can > > change, and for a number of modules changes pretty often. This is > > especially true for a number of modules developed by a community > > wider than a single person. In particular, a lot of Catalyst and > > Moose-related modules "change" the author often from one release > > to another. > > Wouldn't an option be to actually dynamically generation the SUBDIR > based on cpan's 02package.details.txt then? Could you clarify what you mean by that? During the port creation/update by a maintainer? Nothing prevents the maintainer to use whatever tools to make this happen. During the actual port installation? I think that would be a bad idea. \Anton. -- Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation. -- John McCarthy