From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:10:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCD216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hungershausen@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F24343D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hungershausen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so14524wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eNTEpGxdUIEUfV0GphEaL0jgkEDMhS9l6Fn8/GPor9zAzF22Nc3mX9fC+V4dZnJDjIx+/nUTwKnKV8E2liA/LbjD5QBx7m8ciZKjvJHwJIM0sNRk/opZ8Kf+L/Ps/D+WzEYqVtRGqpcXmA8iI6vSKMFi/1TJJ3MJlo3z1dtNwNE= Received: by 10.54.71.18 with SMTP id t18mr34913wra; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.143.11 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:10:21 +0100 From: Rainer Hungershausen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 5.3 Kernel module with 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:23 -0000 Hi there! I've got a Highpoint RocketRAID 454 Controller running under FreeBSD 5.3. It needs a binary only driver (hpt374.ko) to run. I'd like to upgrade to 6.0 for several reasons, but the latest driver module from highpoint is for 5.3. So here's my question: Is it possible to simply run the 5.3 kernel module under 6.x? In theory this could work if the kernel interfaces haven't changed, right? Please also respond directly to me since I am not subscribed to this list. Thanks for your help, Rainer