From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 18 17:15:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clyde.goodleaf.net (piscator.seanet.com [199.181.165.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0DF37B81B for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:15:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from goodleaf@goodleaf.net) Received: from clyde.goodleaf.net (clyde.goodleaf.net [192.168.0.2]) by clyde.goodleaf.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA07459; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from goodleaf@goodleaf.net) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:30:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "J. Goodleaf" To: Dru Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pgp4pine eats replies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well I do like pgp 6.5.1i. It's hiding in the ports somewhere. I find that it works well for me with pgp4pine. Plus, the configuration profile is much easier with 6 than with 5 since the command line syntax is somewhat different. Good luck. -J =============================== John Goodleaf goodleaf@goodleaf.net PGP key: finger goodleaf@clyde.goodleaf.net =============================== On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Dru wrote: > > Having tried way too many configurations of pgp4pine, I've decided to nuke > all traces of pgp completely from my system and try again from scratch. > Before I do, which version of pgp do you recommend, as there are 4 in the > ports collection to choose from. Also, what version of Pine are you using? > I still have the source code for pgp4pine-1.75, so I'll fight again > tomorrow. > > TIA. > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, J. Goodleaf wrote: > > > Well that's a puzzler. I had no problem once I shifted to version 1.75. Of > > course, I never used PGP 5. Perhaps it would be worthwhile grabbing the > > 6.5.1i port? (It's still a beta I think, but I have never had a problem > > with it.) I guess I would recommend a careful looking-over of your > > .pgp4pinerc file. In particular, check the sections for ASCII > > armoring--should be on, detached signatures--mine is off, and universal > > text, which should also be on. > > > Same as yours. > > > > > > When you put in 1.75 did you make sure to get rid of 1.74 completely? > > > Yes. > > Dru > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message