Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 14:56:06 +0100 (BST) From: Dominic Marks <dominic_marks@btinternet.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: docs/29872: Confliciting references regarding bpf kernel option Message-ID: <200108191356.f7JDu6M60700@host213-123-129-118.in-addr.btopenworld.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 29872 >Category: docs >Synopsis: Confliciting references regarding bpf kernel option >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Aug 19 07:00:06 PDT 2001 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Dominic Marks >Release: FreeBSD 4.4-PRERELEASE i386 >Organization: Student >Environment: System: FreeBSD host213-123-129-118.in-addr.btopenworld.com 4.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-PRERELEASE #2: Sun Aug 12 18:27:25 BST 2001 dominic@host213-123-130-11.in-addr.btopenworld.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APOLLO i386 >Description: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/networking.html#BPF-NOT-CONFIGURED This document states: 'pseudo-device bpfilter' is required in the kernel configuration. However bpf(4) states that the required line is: 'pseudo-device bpf' and this is supported by LINT. Its confusing to have multiple options, even if both of them work. >How-To-Repeat: books/faq/book.sgml >Fix: Apply: 8876c8876 < <programlisting>pseudo-device bpfilter # Berkeley Packet Filter</programlisting> --- > <programlisting>pseudo-device bpf # Berkeley Packet Filter</programlisting> Dominic Marks >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108191356.f7JDu6M60700>