From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:19:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7A16A41A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0017713C468 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0F6JL30048852; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:19:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m0F6JL0I048851; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:19:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:19:21 -0500 From: David Schultz To: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: <20080115061921.GA48648@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: "Mikhail T." , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200707051510.l65FAAEp090370@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707051510.l65FAAEp090370@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/96393: [libz] [patch] assembler implementations for libz on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:19:34 -0000 Have you considered submitting these patches to the vendor? It doesn't seem sensible for FreeBSD to independently maintain hundreds of lines of hand-optimized assembly unless there's a compelling need for it.