Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:50:07 GMT From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info Message-ID: <201106061850.p56Io7jE064699@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/155034; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: jh@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:42:49 +0100 n 6 June 2011 19:20, <jh@freebsd.org> wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jh > State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 18:04:17 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > Not a bug. As far as I can see ignoring the signal would violate POSIX: > > "For SIGINT, the dd utility shall interrupt its current processing, > write status information to standard error, and exit as though > terminated by SIGINT. It shall take the standard action for all other > signals; - -" > Clear and unambiguous wording, thank you very much for sorting this! Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106061850.p56Io7jE064699>