Date: 11 Sep 2000 15:18:38 -0000 From: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: bin/21203: MFC of sed -E into RELENG_4 Message-ID: <20000911151838.4583.qmail@ringwraith.office1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 21203 >Category: bin >Synopsis: MFC of sed -E into RELENG_4 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Sep 11 08:30:01 PDT 2000 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@orbitel.bg> >Release: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 >Organization: Orbitel JSCo. >Environment: RELENG_4 as of today >Description: A mail I sent to -hackers on Aug 23.. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: MFC of sed -E Hey there, Is there any compelling reason not to merge the extended regexp capabilities of /usr/bin/sed? The patches in the following revisions apply cleanly to RELENG_4's sed (except for the $FreeBSD id's, of course ;), and -E works as expected. src/usr.bin/sed/compile.c 1.14 src/usr.bin/sed/extern.h 1.5 src/usr.bin/sed/main.c 1.10 src/usr.bin/sed/sed.1 1.10 G'luck, Peter --- end of previous e-mail I received no reply, so I guess no one has any compelling reasons :) >How-To-Repeat: try to do anything a bit complexish with sed; grow slightly irritated ;) >Fix: Apply the patches from the revisions listed above. Works for me. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000911151838.4583.qmail>