Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:27:23 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r191900 - in head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common: fs fs/zfs sys Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10905071427x21e2dcf6q6e8bdcbd39915ec7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200905072028.n47KS6Zc067249@svn.freebsd.org> References: <200905072028.n47KS6Zc067249@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/5/7 Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org>: > Author: kmacy > Date: Thu May =C2=A07 20:28:06 2009 > New Revision: 191900 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191900 > > Log: > =C2=A0Asynchronously release vnodes to avoid blocking on range locks when= calling back in to zfs. > =C2=A0This is based on a fix that went in to opensolaris on March 9th. Ho= wever, it uses a dedicated > =C2=A0thread instead of a Solaris' taskq to avoid doing a blocking memory= allocation with the vnode > =C2=A0interlock held. So did we decide to follow this route? I thought we were exploring cleaner ideas about that. Thanks, Attilio --=20 Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10905071427x21e2dcf6q6e8bdcbd39915ec7>