Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Nov 1997 17:46:29 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freebie.dcfinc.com>
To:        nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Cc:        chad@dcfinc.com, nate@mt.sri.com, rkw@dataplex.net, brian@awfulhak.org, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Version Resolution?
Message-ID:  <199711210046.RAA04475@freebie.dcfinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <199711210040.RAA12221@mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Nov 20, 97 05:40:18 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But there are (can be) seperate copies of newvers.sh in each branch?
> > Seems it would be an administrative procedure to touch it correctly as
> > part of creating a new branch.  How often does that happen?  Couple of
> > times a year?
> 
> More than that, but as I stated before, file corruption even *once*
> isn't acceptable.  The number of problems that will occur when a branch
> occurs (and everyone and his dog decides to finally download things)
> means that the # of questions due to bogus files is now bigger than the
> number of questions solved by implementing the solution.

I'm obviously ignorant of the discussions you had with Richard.  Can you 
explain the "file corruption" you imagine?

	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL22)              Brother, can you paradigm?
602-953-1392  chad@dcfinc.com  chad@anasazi.com  crl22@aol.com
DCF, Inc. - 14523 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona  85254



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711210046.RAA04475>