Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:43:28 +0100 From: phk@phk.freebsd.dk To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Indiscriminately installing all .h files in /usr/include/* Message-ID: <43866.1044917008@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:40:16 PST." <20030210224016.GH88781@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030210224016.GH88781@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >* Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> [030210 14:34] wrote: >> > >> > I would prefer labeling the stuff that should go into /usr/include, >> > it shouldn't be the default to export stuff unless you ask for it. >> >> Sticking this stuff inside include files means modifying imported files. >> I'd actually prefer a mechanism like this to lurk in the Makefiles as you >> can fully encapsulate requirements like the /usr/include/<dir> is different >> than the source directory. > >That makes sense. I can live with that too, as long as the default is "don't install". -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43866.1044917008>