Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: compiler bug or source bug? 
Message-ID:  <200106041612.MAA76912@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010604054300.1F1DE380E@overcee.netplex.com.au>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106032228220.78535-100000@beppo.feral.com> <20010604054300.1F1DE380E@overcee.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 03 Jun 2001 22:43:00 -0700, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> said:

> We could make off_t a long long on the alpha.  Otherwise the formats need:
>   printf("%lld", (long long) pos);  /* or %qd to shut up the ANSI warning */

They always need that, until printf learns about the `j' width
specifier (at which time they all change to `printf("%jd",
(intmax_t)pos);').  off_t is another one of those types which can be
defined as absolutely any arithmetic type the implementation wishes.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106041612.MAA76912>