Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 16:02:15 +0100 (BST) From: Paul Richards <paul@isl.cf.ac.uk> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: ache@freefall.cdrom.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-gnu@freefall.cdrom.com, thud-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/libreadline Makefile Message-ID: <199505091502.QAA20219@isl.cf.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <199505090600.QAA29655@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at May 9, 95 04:00:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Bruce Evans who said > > I still have libg++ and libforms on my list of things to change (I think > libncurses was done yesterday). > I think libforms should just be removed from 2.0.5. It's not used by anything and was not intended to be released in that form (hey, everyone knows my view on this by now :-) The current libforms is completely imcompatible with what's currently in the tree so we'd have to have another major number bump as soon as I commit that. > Should we bump the version number _every_ time the interface is changed > or extended? This would be easiest to remember to do, but would result > in many more minor version numbers and recompiling. Bumping the major > number is more important. It's not clear how 2.0 packages work with > the current libg++ (gnuregexp was removed). I thought we agreed that it would get bunped *once* per release. -- Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.isl.cf.ac.uk/ Phone: +44 1222 874000 x6646 (work), +44 1222 457651 (home)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505091502.QAA20219>