Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:17:25 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        Johannes Jost Meixner <johannes@meixner.dk>, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org>, emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CVE-2015-7547 and linux-f10-* ports?
Message-ID:  <CADL2u4hzb0%2BeLCmv%2B8qEtPnAzFFVk7-cf3N-gE8cQneuOkyJfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <864mcwx1o0.fsf@desk.des.no>
References:  <CADL2u4gFJEz1APFeoDJ=xO-ze3%2BaZAWvJqqy1G3WZfD4OHg5uQ@mail.gmail.com> <86mvqxlvr3.fsf@desk.des.no> <20160220223655.GA86662@chd.heemeyer.club> <CADL2u4hqZh7RyK=hkak1%2BVkM4-F58NexGW=_vp1mxVrTwYA31w@mail.gmail.com> <20160220234258.GA1377@chd.heemeyer.club> <CADL2u4htEzVn8p-wTwmzQOZr2tttCyFNVEHzV48uN27YO82pog@mail.gmail.com> <56CB3373.7050100@meixner.dk> <56CB8819.9030009@freebsd.org> <86d1rnk9cd.fsf@desk.des.no> <CADL2u4haoP07PY8QvuRTVpMZNLyWfYsozi-O-FfQfV39uRcC8w@mail.gmail.com> <864mcwx1o0.fsf@desk.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2016-02-25 16:14 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no>:
> Ren=C3=A9 Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
>> > In that case, I suggest issuing an EN to bump compat.linux.osrelease
>> > and retiring the f10 ports.
>> What is the best way to prepare an EN? Patching stable/9 and create a
>> Phabricator diff?
>
> Patch stable/9 and ask re@ and so@ for an EN.  Remember to bump
> __FreeBSD_version.  As far as I can tell, the package builders skip the
> version checks, so the c6 packages are already available.  In fact, they
> are even the default, which is probably not intentional.
>
I patched stable/9, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5418

>> > That's SIOCGIFNAME, and it's not implemented in 11 either.
>> Ah, OK. Ideally we should compile a list of missing ioctls and
>> implement them.
>
> That would be really hard, as ioctls can vary from platform to platform,
> and drivers can add ioctls to the system.  The best you can do is ask
> users to report Linux applications that complain about missing ioctls,
> and keep a list of which ioctls they complain about.
>
Hmm, so I should win the lottery first ;)

Ren=C3=A9



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADL2u4hzb0%2BeLCmv%2B8qEtPnAzFFVk7-cf3N-gE8cQneuOkyJfA>