From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 4 16:11:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CBB106568D; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811D18FC16; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8DE46B0D; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:11:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:11:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Attilio Rao In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10911040804p6419778bgc363951104adb76e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <200911040132.nA41WxtQ012750@svn.freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10911040804p6419778bgc363951104adb76e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r198868 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:11:21 -0000 On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Attilio Rao wrote: >> I think the warning is a good idea, but I don't think we should include the >> URL. We have no control over where it points or what information it will >> contain in the future. Is there a hardware vendor errata number/document >> that we can point at instead, or alternatively, can we just leave it with >> the first warning line? > > I tried to look for an errata pdf from AMD, but I've been unable to locate > one and that's the only 'close' reference I could find. I'm fine with > stripping the link, through, I actually wasn't very eager to add it, I just > did for a complete reference. I'm fine with it in a source comment, just not sure about kernel output. Robert