Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:26:39 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternative windowmanagers Message-ID: <20110806142639.GB48611@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <CAGu_qiPssFewdGFMeodZXELQDGTf9UfhcZG1=HEv%2B3KZgna%2BEQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110805191214.GA19848@kar.user-mode.org> <20110805190825.d2cf7f06.rodperson@rodperson.com> <20110806015652.GB45455@guilt.hydra> <CAGu_qiPssFewdGFMeodZXELQDGTf9UfhcZG1=HEv%2B3KZgna%2BEQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jho1yZJdad60DJr+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote: > > > > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox. > > > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox. > > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under > current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much > difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are > recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reaso= n? Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the killer feature. That, and it has a better license than OpenBox. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --jho1yZJdad60DJr+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk49Tx8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUcFgCguaOLbAM8ig62w4Tjyxi2ZhL+ VSYAn290CzXgJkyo4D/BC50Cs3Jowq4G =7tGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jho1yZJdad60DJr+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110806142639.GB48611>