Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:57:05 +0100 From: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r186194 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/fs/hpfs sys/fs/msdosfs sys/fs/ntfs sys/fs/nwfs sys/fs/smbfs sys/gnu/fs/ext2fs sys/gnu/fs/reiserfs sys/gnu/fs/xfs/FreeBSD sys/ufs/ufs Message-ID: <20081217225705.GA16689@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081217175758.GD8716@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> References: <200812162113.mBGLDCkB047820@svn.freebsd.org> <20081217175758.GD8716@roadrunner.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1217T1857, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > Author: trasz > > Date: Tue Dec 16 21:13:11 2008 > > New Revision: 186194 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/186194 > > > > Log: > > According to phk@, VOP_STRATEGY should never, _ever_, return > > anything other than 0. Make it so. This fixes > > "panic: VOP_STRATEGY failed bp=0xc320dd90 vp=0xc3b9f648", > > encountered when writing to an orphaned filesystem. Reason > > for the panic was the following assert: > > KASSERT(i == 0, ("VOP_STRATEGY failed bp=%p vp=%p", bp, bp->b_vp)); > > at vfs_bio:bufstrategy(). > > Is such a change also needed/recommended for the FUSE port? It seems fusefs-kmod already does the right thing by always returning 0. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081217225705.GA16689>