Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:13:36 +0200 From: tallison <talisson@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Baytrail panics because of buggy ACPI table Message-ID: <CACdvZqZPe0QNPNL3Xy0Dohz2C-mSpqC47bXiLp2T1YFgySMaWg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACdvZqbRaFm1YGm4RV3ZtBORA05kwVGk499Kob1dVo2B7V8ZKg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACdvZqbRaFm1YGm4RV3ZtBORA05kwVGk499Kob1dVo2B7V8ZKg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Doesn't anyone know if this fix will make it into 9.3 RELEASE? IMO it would probably be worth making a point release for this fix if not. A 9.3.1, and perhaps a 10.0.1 or something like that. As said a lot of these boards are being sold, and many end up in home servers that run FreeBSD. I have noticed there are occasional mails about this problem in the list already, and I suspect there are many others trying FreeBSD, FreeNAS etc that run into this kernel panic and then just decide to try something else. On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:21 AM, tallison <talisson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Intel Bay Trail/Silvermont devices are becoming quite popular. > Unfortunately current FreeBSD releases don't work on them, as they get a > kernel panic. > A patch for this has been implemented in Linux, and a few months ago in > FreeBSD CURRENT as well. A few weeks ago I asked that it be included into > the STABLE branches as well, so that it makes its way into the next > releases. > > I can see that it was added to the STABLE branches a few days ago, as per > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187966 > > Now my question is this; will this fix make its way into 9.3 RELEASE, or > is it too late? > Would be good if it did IMO, as said a lot of people are buying Bay Trail > struff. > > BR > talisson >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdvZqZPe0QNPNL3Xy0Dohz2C-mSpqC47bXiLp2T1YFgySMaWg>