Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:53:05 +0000 From: Anthony Naggs <tony@ubik.demon.co.uk> To: Darren Bolding <darren@faucet.net> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Q] D-Link DWL-520+ Message-ID: <BT6x$aABSn7%2BIwwF@ubik.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030617001013.GA10301@index.faucet.net> References: <20030617001013.GA10301@index.faucet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20030617001013.GA10301@index.faucet.net>, Darren Bolding <darren@faucet.net> writes >I've been considering getting some PCI card wireless adapaters for various >systems, and when researching the DWL-520+ came across somwhat conflicting >information. > >This card is not listed as supported by FreeBSD. I was wondering if anyone >has had any luck with it? It is not supported. >From what I can tell, the DWL-520+ uses a TI chip It seems like all "22 Mbps" "802.11b+" cards use TI chips. >as opposed to the DWL-520 >which uses a prism 2.5 chipset. The last discussion I was able to glean any >information from was from several months ago. > >I'm just wondering if there has been, or is likely to be, any progress on >this card. My understanding is that TI have declined to provide programming information to either FreeBSD or Linux developers. Probably this is just TI protecting what they consider to be valuable information about their technologies. Possibly a business case could be presented to TI that there are X million BSD & Linux systems that they are excluding themselves from. Maybe they would change their minds, but there are a growing number of suppliers of conforming 11Mbps 802.11b chipsets with lower prices and TI would not get much business from BSD & Linux systems. Within a few months anyone really caring about the higher speed will probably be shopping for an 802.11g system anyway. I'm interested in contributing to FreeBSD's wireless networking support, but I've chosen to work on parts with documentation & manufacturer support. (Realtek's 802.11b chip.) Poking around in TI's Windows drivers and trying to determine how their chip works sounds like a time consuming project, with no guarantee that TI wont have moved on to something new before the driver is finished. Tony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BT6x$aABSn7%2BIwwF>