From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jan 24 07:52:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA04103
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 07:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA04046;
          Fri, 24 Jan 1997 07:51:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA07157; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 08:51:50 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 08:51:50 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199701241551.IAA07157@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Mark Mayo <mark@quickweb.com>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DDD 2.0 port
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.94.970124002708.9005A-100000@vinyl.quickweb.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.94.970124002708.9005A-100000@vinyl.quickweb.com>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hi, I was wondering if anyone has ported DDD 2.0 to FreeBSD (2.2-x).

I'm still using 1.4.

> Also, what's the general consensus on DDD?? It looks excellent from
> the web page (http://www.cs.tu-bs.de/softech/ddd/)...  Is there are
> better GUI debugger out there for FreeBSD? DDD certainly seems way
> more sophisticated than xxgdb!

I find it to easiest to use debugger around, and give it high-marks.



Nate