From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 14 15:08:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA04186 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 15:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr09.primenet.com (tlambert@usr09.primenet.com [206.165.6.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04167 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 15:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA24466; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 15:08:09 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199709142208.PAA24466@usr09.primenet.com> Subject: Re: nfs startup - perhaps it is a problem To: sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 22:08:08 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199709141843.LAA02362@kithrup.com> from "Sean Eric Fagan" at Sep 14, 97 11:43:10 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In article <19970914142725.EE13458.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@uriah.heep.sax.de> J"org writes: > >This would mean the resolver were broken. Did you tcpdump it? > > That's what I asked. > > Several times. The packets were dumped. Is the tool used to do this really that important? The fact is there were packets sent that should never have been sent given the system configuration requiring the use of the hosts file before bind, and the fact the data was availble in the hosts file. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.