From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 21:10:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF031065670; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB43E8FC08; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 21:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p97LAYHH003767; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:10:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p97LAXkn003764; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:10:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:10:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Glen Barber In-Reply-To: <4E8F6311.2060704@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <81477.1318015137@critter.freebsd.dk> <4E8F55CC.3060302@FreeBSD.org> <4E8F6311.2060704@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:10:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Garrett Cooper , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Benjamin Kaduk , Arnaud Lacombe Subject: Re: aliasing (or renaming) kern.geom.debugflags X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:10:35 -0000 On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Glen Barber wrote: > On 10/7/11 4:27 PM, Warren Block wrote: >>> In my experience, without kern.geom.debugflags=16, the MBR will not be >>> written to the memstick, leaving you with what would effectively be a >>> coaster in the not-so-distant past. >> >> Tried it just now with the 9.0-BETA3 memstick image. >> > > [...] > >> >> Followed by removing the memory stick without unmounting it to avoid >> overwriting part of the image. No obvious problems, but no, it's not >> polite. (I'm thinking "automounter" here.) >> > > Me not being one that uses hald or devd for USB, I'm certain the device > was not mounted when writing the memstick image. In the former case of > your test, is the USB stick bootable? I cleared the first 34 blocks and wrote it again to make sure, but yes.