From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 15:49:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AF716A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:49:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8601943D5C for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so75668rnf for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:49:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=f5EXONt0xPsfIFeEIX63Sl35tKpPFFZC38G4zJL4BvBWXnCQBbC2SBze8wmeeBgxszkbiemyyskH04LKWPO25VSuX6HRfIZithdJLVU7tzl25dbOJu4/wdIhAl6njz7pP2As320Ed3wGN2zxN3eX6yOGtpXBYJoV085avbjTnqY= Received: by 10.38.126.33 with SMTP id y33mr373518rnc; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.46 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:49:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:49:51 +0200 From: Sander Vesik To: Chris Zumbrunn In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050213001621.59515.qmail@web53907.mail.yahoo.com> <200502180212.08316.aksis@idea-anvil.net> cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sander Vesik List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:49:53 -0000 > Except that there is no reason why individual > corporations/groups/organisations can't take the role of marketing > FreeBSD to these general markets under their brands and with their > specific added value and services. FreeBSD.org could keep the > gatekeeper in place and concentrate on development while other > organisations would operate out there in the "real world" and deal with > the masses. Would it be FreeBSD then? Besides, we have already been there with the CD-ROM companies, haven't we? > > /czv >