From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  3 23:53:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E132B16A4B3
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2003 23:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AC34400E
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2003 23:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from clint@0lsen.net)
Received: from 0lsen.net ([12.203.21.192])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <20031004065315011006q1r5e>; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 06:53:15 +0000
Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id C41746C9; Fri,  3 Oct 2003 23:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:53:14 -0700
From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Message-ID: <20031004065314.GA16632@0lsen.net>
References: <20031004064006.GA11754@0lsen.net>
	<oprwiagjk48ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <oprwiagjk48ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization: NULlsen Network
X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites!
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Still having issues - Shared object "libintl.so.1" not found
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 06:53:19 -0000

On Oct 04, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> 
> Try to run 'portupgrade -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes'..

I think the dependencies of some of these ports may not be quite right.  I
ran this command earlier without the -m flag, and some of the recursive
dependencies failed for example because GNU make was taken out of commision
by the missing library.  It would seem that gmake would be (one of) the
first order(s) of business.  Of course, this might be a failure mode that
wasn't expected...

Thanks,

-Clint