From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 18 07:08:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3F616A405; Thu, 18 May 2006 07:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout3.yahoo.com (mrout3.yahoo.com [216.145.54.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D62D43D49; Thu, 18 May 2006 07:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy8.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/y.out) with ESMTP id k4I78HQj008868; Thu, 18 May 2006 00:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:44:24 -0700 Message-ID: From: gnn@FreeBSD.org To: Benno Rice In-Reply-To: <446BBE65.50104@FreeBSD.org> References: <446BBE65.50104@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-apple-darwin8.5.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Flash File Systems or Translation Layers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:08:40 -0000 At Thu, 18 May 2006 10:23:01 +1000, Benno Rice wrote: > > gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > So, a few of us have talked off list of the need for a flash file > > system or translation layer for FreeBSD in order to better target the > > kind of boards we want to support. The one lead I had was to a poorly > > written, binary only solution with nasty licensing. That is, it was > > a dead end. Does anyone know of anything that exists now that we > > might coopt or have the knowledge to do this right/well? > > I thought about doing a port of jffs2. Probably a rewrite actually, so > we can have a non-GPL version. It's waiting on me getting to the point > where I need it though. =) Yes, one of my friends who is not on this list pointed me to jffs2, but we would definitely need a non-GPL rewrite I suspect. Later, George