From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 23 20:54:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C468F342
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 20:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58607FE8
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NKsuU1033826
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 00:54:56 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 00:54:56 +0400 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305240053580.26794@woozle.rinet.ru>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 24 May 2013 00:54:56 +0400 (MSK)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:54:57 -0000

Dear colleagues,

is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291

(the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner per 
provider; old output is retained as `list' command)

to at least stable/9 ?

The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts 
which one use in production.

If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny, 
thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.

Thanks!

-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck@FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------