Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:46:34 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Fengping Li <fli@post.its.mcw.edu> Cc: Kirk Brogdon <kirk@alaptech.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: arp messages Message-ID: <20001003224634.X25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1001003151924.20075A-100000@post.its.mcw.edu>; from fli@post.its.mcw.edu on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:22:28PM -0500 References: <20001003103436.A17606@bsd1.alaptech.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1001003151924.20075A-100000@post.its.mcw.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:22:28PM -0500, Fengping Li wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Kirk Brogdon wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:34:36 -0800 > > From: Kirk Brogdon <kirk@alaptech.com> > > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: arp messages > > > > I get these "arp: 192.168.x.x is on rl0 but got reply from > > <mac> on fxp0" quite often. Is something actually wrong or are > > these just informational? Everything seems to be working okay. > > > > rl0 is my lan interface and fxp0 is the outside interface > > (cable modem). I have the natd_interface parameter pointed at > > fxp0 in rc.conf. > > It happens when two cards with diffrent network plug into one hub. > It still works but it is annoying. And is a broken configuration. If that is your problem, do not plug two NICs into one collision domain. It can break things and will always reduce network throuhgput. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001003224634.X25121>