From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 12:21:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D48216A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 12:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from royk.itea.ntnu.no (royk.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0228743D1D for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 12:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDE36716F for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by royk.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 32779 invoked by uid 1001); 30 May 2005 14:21:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 May 2005 14:21:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 14:21:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20050529120946.GA47043@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: <20050530142017.Y32599@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <20050529134323.L20141@maren.thelosingend.net> <20050529120946.GA47043@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Ulf Magnusson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:21:13 -0000 * Erik Trulsson [2005-05-29 14:09 +0200] > Although it is theoretically fine to have just a slave device on an IDE > channel without a master device, that configuration fails to work in > many cases. If it fails to work it is probably a bug in some component > of the system, but that doesn't help the person having the problem. > > If you have just a single IDE device on an IDE channel it should be > configured as master, not as slave. Having it configured as slave is > supposed to work, but often does not work and is therefore not > recommended. It seems you are right! However, there should be no need for a slave-only setup anyway.