Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 14:04:24 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "Francisco Reyes" <fran@reyes.somos.net>, "Chris Dillon" <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "David Kelly" <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, "FreeBSD Chat List" <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ECC worth the extra cost for SOHO server? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010110140119.04980410@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200101100518.AAA69752@sanson.reyes.somos.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010109173437.047ebe40@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:03 PM 1/9/2001, Francisco Reyes wrote: >It probably doesn't support ECC. I've got an e-mail in to Via Technologies, but I am not hopeful that the chipset supports ECC. It's a shame.... When you're doing up to 133 million accesses a second, it's nice to have some safeguards. But AMD and Via need to get into the mainstream consumer market, where price is an issue and ECC will rarely be used. I think that you can use the ECC-enabled North Bridge chip from the KX-133 chipset if you really need ECC. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010110140119.04980410>