Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:42:40 -0700
From:      Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org>
To:        John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>
Cc:        Olivier Warin <daffy@xview.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dtrace port status
Message-ID:  <46F367E0.4000300@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070920203413.GA13737@what-creek.com>
References:  <6385B28C-01D1-459A-9543-E36C89C7F36E@xview.net> <20070920203413.GA13737@what-creek.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Birrell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:34:19PM +0200, Olivier Warin wrote:
> > I recently wanted to give dtrace on FreeBSD a try but found this  
> > project to be stopped due to a licensing issue.
> > Will we see dtrace in the base just like zfs anytime (hopefully) soon ?
>
> I'm am currently trying to find a way around the licensing issues.
> Sun is no help at all. The patent clauses in their CDDL are a big deal.
> They claim that they don't want to sue anyone over patents, but
> when push comes to shove they actually will. Refer to the Netapp
> lawsuits.
>   

> ...
> DTrace consists mainly of kernel modules, however in order for DTrace
> to inspect the kernel internals it has to have some code inside
> existing BSD licensed files.
>   

This should not be a problem.
Code added to BSD licensed files should be BSD licensed.

Darren




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F367E0.4000300>