From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 20 5:59:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BB337B400 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 05:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9FD43E72 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 05:59:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7KCxMUR090944; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:59:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7KCxMHP090943; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:59:22 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Roman Neuhauser Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: not able to mount devices as normal user? Message-ID: <20020820125922.GG88937@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <3D5EFE0E.298AB5AC@buffalo.edu> <1029714373.720.2.camel@messias.netcabo.pt> <20020820121934.GM389@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020820121934.GM389@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > this implies you have sudo (/usr/ports/security/sudo) installed. > you should be warned that this software has a pretto poor security > record, and definitely should not be used on computers accessible > from internet. you might want to try op /usr/ports/security/op) > instead. Eh? sudo is maintained by a member of the OpenBSD team as part of the OpenB= SD base, right? Why should it have poor security? Granted, there have been 2 advisories in the past few months, but that doesn't mean op hasn't got any flaws. I'm sticking with sudo for the moment. My EUR 0.02. --Stijn --=20 This sentence contradicts itself -- no actually it doesn't. -- Hofstadter --11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9Yj0qY3r/tLQmfWcRAiFBAJ4yEHaHvHMTK1h7xmNhkm3sixxnQQCdFqWo dQgHtYb1StA+5UZuBkdi3vk= =/g3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --11Y7aswkeuHtSBEs-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message