From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 5 17:58:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA28108 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:58:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA28096 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:58:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #3) id 0yAm7L-0004KN-00; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:07 -0800 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:40:05 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Julian Elischer cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: http://www.dpt.com/os2.htm In-Reply-To: <34FF5444.ABD322C@whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > > > > Also, it would nice if the DPT driver was actually available in a > > > released version of FreeBSD first. The 2.2-stable version is great, but > > > remains uncommitted. > > > > > > Tom > > > > Last I looked at the DPT driver, it required the same software interrupt > > hooks that CAM required. I don't think that we can make these changes > > so close to the 2.2.6 release, but I will merge them in after 2.2.6 is > > cut. > > the DPT driver for 2.2 (which I have in my tree ready to commit) > supplies it's own software interrupt hooks which can be discarded when > the CAM stuff is merged in. That is what I thought. Can those hooks be conditionally compiled to reassure those how are skeptical about the DPT driver? At least the DPT driver can be shipped in 2.2.6 tree then. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message