Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:21:22 +1000 (EST) From: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> To: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How many sites have all of the i386 DP1 bits? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.20.0204081318270.4244-100000@azure.dstc.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <20020408031724.GC8008@freebsdmall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:03:31PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > > i am a bit disappointed that the 5.0 dp1 iso release is inconsistent with > > releases before it. why not create a 5.0 directory and put the images in > > there since it is a multi cd release, rather than dropping them into the > > main iso-images directory ? > > Hey Jason, > > It's inconsistent because it is not a normal release. There are > just two images rather than 5. I think adding two extra text files > and a directory would be unnecessary for just TWO files. Sheesh, that > makes 3 releases in a row that you've followed up with minor nit-picks > about release layout or announcements. We're not always going to > think exactly alike, so please lets focus on more important issues. ;) i am disappointed that it's seen as a "nit pick" rather than constructive criticism of the (evolving) release process. it isn't personal to you, but you're the main (only?) person i see providing information/coordinating the release process so you're the defacto mirror manager for criticisms. do you prefer silence ? the lack of any other feedback from anyone would lead me to believe freebsd must have a perfect release mechanism. hmm. perhaps my cynicism is showing. regards, -jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.20.0204081318270.4244-100000>