From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  4 22:18:14 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96F7106566B;
	Mon,  4 Jul 2011 22:18:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.210.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712728FC0A;
	Mon,  4 Jul 2011 22:18:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so6346127iyb.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
	bh=87hLWBFmarrb4k5+w/Q6tYq+Gx3Rh4S7HSvw6XOMBdI=;
	b=ilCfHqXgEz8HmqF6g0K41LGS+dICGgg9n7+32vb7SNO8741ncI847BH/XzXtNR28/5
	VQ2zFfg0HouJqHYc+2OggbylncGWfplA9mJwTtKybFH6neujUSgDrugI6myIqzghy6zk
	5DA7nfqugtfX5Gu+Qem0TrxIuF2X9u3IY9PE0=
Received: by 10.43.49.136 with SMTP id va8mr7491598icb.248.1309817893716;
	Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-19-40-95.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net
	[99.19.40.95])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13sm1307552ibi.43.2011.07.04.15.18.12
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: "J. Hellenthal" <jhellenthal@gmail.com>
Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p64MI95P029634
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:18:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net)
Received: (from jhell@localhost)
	by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p64MI9Ok029633;
	Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:18:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:18:09 -0400
From: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net>
To: Olli Hauer <ohauer@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20110704221809.GC4502@DataIX.net>
References: <20110704144853.GA42273@DataIX.net> <4E122446.8000401@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E122446.8000401@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: security/{nmap,zenmap} consolodation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:18:14 -0000



On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:36:22PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2011-07-04 16:48, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > 
> > Hi ohauer@
> > 
> > I was curious if you would be intnerested in consolidating
> > security/zenmap into security/nmap with the options framework and
> > deprecating security/zenmap since it continually falls pretty far behind
> > newer versions of nmap in ports.
> > 
> > I am fairly sure that within the next couple days I could come up with a
> > prototype Makefile for this if you are interested or would like me to do
> > so but I don't want to put any time into it if this will not happen.
> > 
> > Let me know what you think.
> 
> I haven't touched zenmap because I don't use a gui on any of my FreeBSD
> machines (my gui replacement is parameter -oN / -oG and vi ;)
> Thats also the reason for me to keep the ports nmap/zenmap separate.

Understandable. ;)
> 
> If you have patches for zenmap or perhaps want to maintain zenmap I'm fine
> with it.

Some people have mentioned a slave port. Would you mind if that happened
?