From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 29 19:42:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C23537B735 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 19:42:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA81417; Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:42:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 22:42:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam To: Alan Clegg Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Question regarding restriction of mindguard (games/mindguard) In-Reply-To: <20000728091327.F11712@diskfarm.firehouse.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Alan Clegg wrote: >While the author of this software claims to have solved the problem of >distribution, there is a note on his web page that states (in part): > >"MindGuard is free software for all non-evil users" > http://zapatopi.net/mindguard.html#dl > >This makes me wonder if there should be a RESTRICTED= clause in the >Makefile, and if so, what its setting should be. > >Should we, perhaps add a new knob to /etc/rc.conf for "EVIL_USER" with >"YES", "NO", and "SHARED_ENVIRONMENT" settings? > Why abuse rc.conf when we have existing login classes? ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message