Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:29:23 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Guidelines for new port version variables Message-ID: <20000929162923.J38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0009290956210.7333-100000@blues.jpj.net>; from trevor@jpj.net on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:57:15AM -0400 References: <20000928172551.G38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0009290956210.7333-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 09:57:15AM -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> Bill Fumerola wrote:
>
> > We won't have FreeBSD 4.2.1 just because we had a 4.1.1, and we won't have
> > FreeBSD 4.2.0, because the .0 is implied.
>
> $ uname -r
> 4.0-20000214-CURRENT
That's because we require a major and minor release number. We don't
require a point release number.
or
Thats because we require a portname and portversion. We don't require
a portrevision.
The parallel stands.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000929162923.J38472>