From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  9 22:48:37 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FC747D;
 Thu,  9 May 2013 22:48:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vb0-x229.google.com (mail-vb0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::229])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBCB8F2;
 Thu,  9 May 2013 22:48:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id w8so3082898vbf.0
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 09 May 2013 15:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
 :content-type; bh=H0tGq2/06OJdXANEgO2beELDTKECYjGH9njI0z2m7pc=;
 b=H8/2IZfvbz4+iyT2jWq+tJycbOWxaqW2xmtiKd1Yv5XLhkzS9aTJQvMIWqtsW8QB7r
 yRHgajWPToY7Jde+DCsfZ0yjSrRzDcP1A1nN0qJm2t4oJS/Bj1pSjEQpttPTMEU9PdPo
 UzhqL1ffg9r9M5UVkSrgc47G5BkFsk4MRQjJaR+LPdjyxKIg1DyCo0wTMGTL/BC8FPvf
 2vCrreLdl23vQaFXnULjA17cwsL/vvIAV7lp1RPpflpuia9yQz8rRaPEB9OEECcz+OPi
 ALFaQTT/4JkQhu14HZhDQe2gwRZdWOcmLpey63ooS9ipi8KH59N0KNwvEtt9UCK3HzRA
 rS4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.176.163 with SMTP id cj3mr8101187vdc.35.1368139714898;
 Thu, 09 May 2013 15:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.141.72 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 15:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:48:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGHfRMC7_YVV7Ua=UpXEFjd5xWPCjgaLHE9C2XFy5KSXNgV-PA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Why doesn't USE_UNZIP use the base system unzip?
From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:48:37 -0000

    So... trying to trim down dependencies in a ports build and I'm
confused as to why unzip in base (it's been in base for ~5 years)
isn't a sufficient replacement for archivers/unzip in ports. It
doesn't seem like we're doing anything incredibly complicated with
archivers/unzip, so I would think that it would be a drop-in
replacement. Am I incorrect?
Thanks,
-Garrett

PS Please CC me as I'm not currently subscribed to the list.