From owner-cvs-all  Sat Jun 24  3:45:38 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C0D6337B5F9; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 03:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07368;
	Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:45:09 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>,
	Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>,
	Anders Andersson <anders@sanyusan.se>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:41:31 PDT."
             <200006231641.JAA10742@apollo.backplane.com> 
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:45:09 +0200
Message-ID: <7366.961843509@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <200006231641.JAA10742@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes:
>:
>:Right, but if mounting with -osoftdep, does what a "tunefs -n enable"
>:does (and vice versa) fsck will have that knowledge and the tunefs
>:step would be un-needed.
>:
>:--
>:Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>
>    Slight problem:  We've run out of mount option flags.

	mount -o softupdates ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message