Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:21:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library Message-ID: <bug-187926-13-eMwAqPBeOW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 --- Comment #23 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to fk from comment #22) > Just in case it wasn't clear: What I attempted to do in the original patch > was to make sure that ${WRKSRC}/COPYING was included in packages (as that's > the right thing to do assuming the license in the file covers all the > upstream code and the resulting binary) without implying that the FreeBSD > foundation, I or anyone else actually did a license audit to confirm this. That's exactly what LICENSE_FILE does, it puts that exact file in the package. > I wouldn't mind LICENSE_FILE being set to the path of the file that, > according to upstream, contains the license that is relevant, but my > impression is that LICENSE_FILE only works together with LICENSE and the > latter is a claim I'm not interested to make (except for the few upstream > commits I did myself). Each variable is independent. If you define LICENSE_FILE, you get that exact license. In fact, that is what @mat wants all ports to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-187926-13-eMwAqPBeOW>