From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 20:30:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC3716A41F for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BAB43D4C for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9AKUPpR045084 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9AKUPY4045083; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:25 GMT Message-Id: <200510102030.j9AKUPY4045083@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org From: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Panagiotis Astithas List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:30:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86860; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Panagiotis Astithas To: Herve Quiroz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/86860: [patch] Align java/eclipse invocation with javavmwrapper Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:26:23 +0300 Herve Quiroz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Herve Quiroz wrote: > >>Ok, I just realized that the launcher was not executing a 'java' command >>but rather the original 'eclipse' executable so the fix may be more >>complex than the one I submitted. >> >>I am currently installing eclipse then I will have a closer look at this >>issue. > > > After a bit of testing, it appears that the scenario I presented in my > other message (JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_BSDJAVA_JDK_1_1) > will indeed break things. > > And that the fix I submitted does address this problem. Ah, OK, I hadn't considered such a scenario. Thanks for the insight. Panagiotis