Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:27:58 +1100
From:      Antony Mawer <fbsd-questions@mawer.org>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        Kenny Dail <kend@amigo.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ethernet port bondage
Message-ID:  <45491F6E.6090102@mawer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061101221001.GH3839@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <20061101131455.02E5.KEND@amigo.net>	<200611011607.15650.lists@jnielsen.net>	<20061101145816.02E7.KEND@amigo.net> <20061101221001.GH3839@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/11/2006 9:10 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 01), Kenny Dail said:
>>>> I'm running 6.1 Release, and I've been looking for information on
>>>> how to bond multiple ethernet adaptors in one box so that if one
>>>> card or connection fails or is disconnected I still have network
>>>> connectivity.
>>> Have a look at carp(4). It's a failover solution and not a bonding
>>> one, but it sounds like that's more what you're after anyway.
>> Thanks for that, but I would be interested in bonding, unless in the
>> FreeBSD world that can't be achieved with failover. It's a fairly
>> straight forward setup on my Linux servers, I was thinking it would
>> be easy enough, but I haven't seen the docs for it anywhere.
> 
> Try ng_fec, although it really doesn't implement fec negotiation, so
> you need to hardcode the settings to match on the switch.  There's also
> ng_one2many.

I posted instructions a while ago on how to setup ng_fec along with an 
HP ProCurve switch supporting FastEtherchannel -- the same should also 
apply for Cisco switches. Be warned that newer HP/Cisco gear has dropped 
support for FEC in favour of 802.3ad/LACP...

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011901.html

I haven't experimented with ng_one2many, but my understanding is that it 
only provides a "dumb" balancing/bonding solution.

Presumably we need an ng_bonding or something along those lines would be 
required to achieve parity with what Linux can provide...?

--Antony



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45491F6E.6090102>