From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Mar 12 15:37:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA01786
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA01781
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.5/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id PAA10257; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:37:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 15:37:03 -0800 (PST)
From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
To: Thomas J Balfe <tbalfe@tioga.com>
cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: CA-95:14
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312035133.5360A-100000@falcon.tioga.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312153623.9840C-100000@nervosa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, Thomas J Balfe wrote:

> Does 2.1R have the RFC 1408 or RFC 1572 telnetd_environment_vulnerability 
> bug worked out of it, or do I have to apply a patch? Are there any other 
> things that I should apply to 2.1R? Thanks.
> Thomas J Balfe

As far as I can tell (strings /usr/bin/telnet | grep -i LD), it doesn't 
appear to be present.

== Chris Layne =============================================================
== coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==