From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 1 14:08:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E9F1065670 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrkvrg@acm.org) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475708FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 14:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrkvrg@acm.org) Received: (qmail 81259 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 2009 14:08:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gecko3.bs.net) (216.220.115.212) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 14:08:47 -0000 From: mfv To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, arek@wup-katowice.pl Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:08:46 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/7.2-STABLE; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <4A4AFC07.6030808@wup-katowice.pl> In-Reply-To: <4A4AFC07.6030808@wup-katowice.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907011008.46084.mrkvrg@acm.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Portaudit strange behavior. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:08:49 -0000 On Wednesday, 1 July 2009 02:02:47 Arek Czereszewski wrote: > Hi, > > On all my servers I have portaudit version 0.5.13 > If I try update audit database (by hand or from periodic script) > I have: > > # portaudit -Fd > auditfile.tbz 100% of 53 kB 39 kBps > portaudit: Database too old. > Old database restored. > portaudit: Download failed. > # > > When I change > > ${portaudit_sites="http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/"} > to > ${portaudit_sites="http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/"} > Like was in 0.5.12 > # portaudit -Fd > auditfile.tbz 100% of 56 kB 34 kBps > New database installed. > Database created: Wed Jul 1 07:40:02 CEST 2009 > Update work fine. > > Anyone have behavior like I have? > > regards > Arek Hello Arek, I've had the same problem for the last few days. Thanks for a temporary solution. Marek