Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:56:25 -0700 From: Robin Schoonover <end@endif.cjb.net> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX vs. INDEX-5 Message-ID: <20040315025627.359E843D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040315024008.GI16268@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <40511777.5010601@ciam.ru> <20040315024008.GI16268@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Mar 2004 21:40:08 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> (03.11.2004 @ 2050 PST): Sergey Matveychuk said, in 0.4K: << > > May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5? > > > > I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5. > > > > What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? > > The ports tree is the same anyway. > > > > Check the archives. This was answered less than a week ago. > And the question was asked by the same person (with the same message, but different message ids and different dates). Apparently the OP has some weird duplication issues going on. -- Robin Schoonover (aka End) # # Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already # tomorrow in Australia.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040315025627.359E843D48>