From owner-freebsd-emulation  Tue Aug 27 22:41:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA01930
          for emulation-outgoing; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA01918
          for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA03373; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: Russell Murphy <rdmurphy@bu.edu>
cc: plm@xs4all.nl, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DOS Emulator (was: Re: JDK 1.02) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:20:44 EDT."
             <199608280220.WAA53832@acs2.bu.edu> 
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 22:40:51 -0700
Message-ID: <3371.841210851@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> OK, I'll bite. I haven't been subscribing here long, would someone
> mind summarizing where things are today and what might be involved
> in moving them along?

Well, both Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> and Sean Eric
Fagan <sef@FreeBSD.org> piped up after I sent my gloom-n-doom message
saying, essentially, that the DOS emulation work was *not* dead and
that sef in particular had just dived back into it and was working
towards a running solution.  A happy coincidence, I'd say, especially
if you or anyone else reading this would care to join in and help them
at this stage - Michael in particular cited a dire lack of time as the
#1 problem holding this work back.

					Jordan