From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 21:23:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC91B16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:23:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D1C43D31 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30294 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 21:23:59 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Sep 2004 21:23:58 -0000 Received: from [10.50.40.210] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8RLNs7Y015103; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:28:02 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr> In-Reply-To: <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409271628.02524.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: Robert Watson cc: Evren Yurtesen Subject: Re: Re(3): panic: sorele X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:23:59 -0000 On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :) > > > > It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding > > kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the > > message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is > > reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as > > well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging > > information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract > > debugging information per the Handbook?) > > I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either... > When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error > > Options Added: > > options INVARIANTS > options KDB > options DDB INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org