Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 May 2002 20:23:16 +0200
From:      Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jay Sachs <jay@eziba.com>
Cc:        java@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Request for review: Standardising Java library directory locations
Message-ID:  <200205151823.UAA07978@smtp.hccnet.nl>
In-Reply-To: <3CDBD919.5000308@eziba.com>
References:  <200205101311.PAA08481@smtp.hccnet.nl> <3CDBD919.5000308@eziba.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jay,

> While it will work, it seems unfortunate to use directories with ','
> characters in them (in the case that PORTEPOCH is defined). What
> motivates the need to support multiple instances of the same version of
> a port differing only by the "port epoch"?

Okay, perhaps the PORTEPOCH is not a good idea. You have a point. I will 
change the proposal for this.

Ernst

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205151823.UAA07978>