From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 19:10:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFB616A403; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B0813C4CE; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1DB5DD5; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:10:58 +0300 (MSK) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE94B5CF4; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:10:57 +0300 (MSK) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) id l0MJ9wAv053058; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:09:58 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:09:58 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20070122190958.GA53027@rambler-co.ru> References: <200701171832.28368.dienst@marcrenearns.de> <474078f80701181348q16ceb16bs40ba45b3d7057b83@mail.gmail.com> <20070121212428.GA47379@rambler-co.ru> <200701221111.56264.jhb@freebsd.org> <1169489832.11889.64.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> <45B506A7.7060909@FreeBSD.org> <1169492498.11889.74.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1169492498.11889.74.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Doug Barton , doc@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, Murray Stokely , re@FreeBSD.org, Marc Ren? Arns Subject: Re: make buildkernel fails without complete source tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:10:59 -0000 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 02:01:38PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > True. I guess this is sort of where I was headed. IMHO we should > either leave it as-is for the traditionalists or we should bite the > bullet and stop providing a separate kernel source tree. As John > pointed out in the message after this one life has moved on and > now /usr/src is teeny compared to the size of disks. Is it worth the > hassle/confusion to provide just kernel source any more? >=20 Thinking of embedded world, it still makes a lot of sense. I think adding a note to Handbook would be a good solution. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFtQwGqRfpzJluFF4RAiLQAKCJWpoFnlr9KSyyX8k/dFwwTT4omgCgmMw8 m2UGLXqhOlfsbB/Rc1D+PmY= =T3k1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--