Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:24:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: lockmgr: thread <..> unlocking unheld lock
Message-ID:  <17230.49819.985757.378764@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200510131530.16376.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <17218.49812.271334.154595@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20051004195742.GA56798@xor.obsecurity.org> <17220.5283.170670.956780@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200510131530.16376.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

John Baldwin writes:
 > On Wednesday 05 October 2005 02:00 pm, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > > It also seems to have started happening on a second amd64 that I just
 > > upgraded from a mid-august -current to CVS cvsupped yesterday.  This
 > > is a UP amd64 3000+..
 > 
 > Can you try reverting any of the recent changes to amd64/include/atomic.h?  
 > The ones to change foo_ptr() to take uintptr_t should be fine, but maybe try 
 > reverting the changes after that (not using +m for example).

Inline asm is Greek to me, and I'd be no better than a monkey typing
at making changes like that.

Would you like me to just try reverting all of 1.38?

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17230.49819.985757.378764>