From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Thu Dec 10 22:48:09 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88124BB33F
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:48:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from brett@lariat.net)
Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CsTbD6N0mz4Ryt
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from brett@lariat.net)
Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost
 [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28768;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:48:04 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <202012102248.PAA28768@mail.lariat.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:42:25 -0700
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>
Subject: Re: Build for Intel iXP420 board?
Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfquMscvtWkYodDyJBU-g3MCKH8ah=HcWV_=oXD+R0yVKw@mail.g
 mail.com>
References: <202012102110.OAA28280@mail.lariat.net>
 <CANCZdfquMscvtWkYodDyJBU-g3MCKH8ah=HcWV_=oXD+R0yVKw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CsTbD6N0mz4Ryt
X-Spamd-Bar: +
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of brett@lariat.net designates 66.62.230.51
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brett@lariat.net
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lariat.net];
 RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[66.62.230.51:from];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.28)[0.283];
 SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[66.62.230.51:from:127.0.2.255];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
 NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:19092, ipnet:66.62.228.0/22, country:US];
 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:48:09 -0000

FreeBSD 9 or 10! These are just old enough that I can't find archives. Were
Avila images ever published in binary form, or would I have to set up a
development machine, check out old sources, and cross-build?

--Brett Glass


At 02:25 PM 12/10/2020, Warner Losh wrote:

>FreeBSD 9 or 10 or maybe 11 is your best bet. 'gateworks' I think 
>is what you want to search for in the sources, not avila, but 
>maybe you can use both to find them. The armv5 port was removed 
>from FreeBSD because it had bit rotted too much. I used to run 
>FreeBSD 8 on these boards as a wireless access point shortly after 
>Sam committed the code to the tree. I've had good luck with 
>FreeBSD stable/10 on other arm gear, but there's been reports of 
>issues on stable/10 with unaligned I/O causing problems for some 
>cache topologies.
>
>WarnerÂ